Ok. Time for a change of mood.
I’m waaaay behind on my movie reviews (once again) so rather than doing a half dozen posts on movies I watched ages ago, I’ll lump them together and shorten the reviews. Here’s your ticket. Grab some popcorn and hang on tight.
Nanny McPhee – I had high hopes for this 21st century Mary Poppins style kid’s show. Those hopes were surpassed. McPhee is darker than her umbrella wielding predecessor. No spoons full of sugar. No marry-go-round horse races. To be honest, Nanny McPhee is a teeny tiny bit scary, maybe scary enough to upset kids of single digit age. But the story is superb. The artistry is fantastic. The acting is sublime. Four grins!
Night At The Museum – Conversely, I really didn’t expect much from this one. Ben Stiller and Robin Williams have both been on my list of annoying non-actors for a while now. I list Stiller along with Will Farrell, Adam Sandler, and Jack Black as comedic actors who just aren’t funny anymore. They stoop to that seventh-grade-locker-room humor that wasn’t really funny even in the seventh grade. Williams, much like Jim Carrey, is such an over actor, he usually ruins an otherwise good movie with his over-the-top performance. But I’m happy to say that both of these generalizations fail in this film. Stiller keeps the humor above board and I am completely shocked to say that Robin Williams acted in this movie. Honest! And he played a supporting role without even trying to steal the show. Amazing! This is a really fun flick that gets a well earned three grins.
Blade Runner – This Sci-Fi classic takes you back to the good ol’ days. Harrison Ford played this role the year after Raiders of the Lost Ark and the year before Return of the Jedi. Tell me this was not the best of the best years for Mr. Ford! Blade Runner has that mystique of being released twice. Once the way the studio wanted it and then later as the director intended. The studio felt the movie was hard to follow because there is very little dialog. So they had Ford come in and add narration in post production. I watched the narrated version keeping in mind the directors cut. I don’t think the narration was necessary, but I also don’t think in ruined the film. It’s a great, dark, brooding, dystopian story that leaves some room for your imagination and doesn’t drag like so many in this genre. It’s no Soylent Green, but it’s good show for it’s niche which earns it three grins.
When I got into my movie trilogy phase a while back, I watched the Alien franchise, which turns out to be a tetralogy with a bonus spin-off franchise in AvP. The Alien franchise fits pretty well into my theories about Hollywood and trilogies.
Alien – Like many movies that grow into franchises, the first one is, IMHO, the best. You have to watch it with a 1979 frame of mind. Remember that you don’t know what the alien looks like. You don’t know about the acidic blood juice. You don’t know how the parasitic, pupa, face hugging thingy works. You don’t know about the chest exploding hatchling. This movie will rock your world and give you nightmares. Awesome sauce! Four grins!
Aliens – Unlike theatrical three act trilogy, Aliens is not a transitional second act. Thus it does not suck. In fact, most fans would say that part two is better than part one. Aliens is arguably the best sequel ever. It doesn’t have the same shock factor as the first one, but it is much more action packed. There’s no question about who the hero will be, but you know the final smack-down will have you on the edge of your seat, cheering and spilling your popcorn. As a bonus you get a genuine, secret bad guy and a tough, cute kid. This film would make a great show without it’s predecessor which makes it a brilliant sequel well worth four grins.
Aliens3 – A full thirteen years after the first movie proved sequel worthy, we get the classic Hollywood unnecessary third chapter. When you run out of ideas, why not resuscitate an old success and hope it still works. This time it didn’t. Sigourney Weaver’s tortured Ripley goes from survivor (part 1); to reluctant, even unwilling, hero (part 2); to smug, bad-attitude, bald-headed, tuff-chick. Blech! On top of this the special effects really suffer in this one. The aliens look almost campy compared to the previous installments. The story is not bad. The acting is tolerable, but it just doesn’t live up to its lineage earning only two grins.
Alien Resurrection – As if we hadn’t learned our lesson from part three, we get yet another unnecessary sequel in part four. And this steamer is just off the chart weird. Adding some star power (Winona Ryder and Ron Perlman) helped a little, but it wasn’t enough to save the show. If the G.I. Jane-esque Ripley in part three ruined a good character, imagine the genetically-engineered, petri-dish Uber-Ripley 2.0 introduced in part four. I won’t ruin the surprise for you (since it’s the only surprise in the whole movie) but let’s just say Ripley is not the sweet Earth girl we used to know. My advice is to leave this one in the bargain bin where you found it and walk away with one grin.
Alien vs. Predator – When I saw the previews, I dismissed this as a genuine shark jumping, combining two long dead series. But I have to admit, this time, it worked. As if to bring the Alien story full circle, AvP goes back to the mysterious feel we had in the first Alien movie in that we are allowed to discover the new plot along with the characters. (Although the title ruins a little of the suspense. They should draw and quarter whoever came up with such a lame label.) It’s intriguing and exciting, a good mix of mystery and action. As awful as this one should have been, I’m giving it three grins
Whew! We made it. And to think that’s not all the movies I’ve seen since my last purge. But seriously, how could I have clumped Dark Knight in with this lot? That would have been sinful!